No for T_J it should be Obama is the black Jesus and he will save America. For Sammy it should be Bush is the greatest president ever.
nice! but TJ shoud read "Barack Hussein Obama is the black Jesus and he will save America from the evil forces of the rebuplicons" SF sould read "George W. Bush is saving America from the libpig/commie/socialist/hippie/illegal imigrant losers. If you dont agree, you're a moran!"
No, when Sam loses, his signature will be more like... Barack Obama can not be trusted to lead our nation. He has a low-level management trainee resume and associates with known racists and bigots. His wife is not patriotic. He has no executive leadership experience, nor the inherent qualities needed to lead our military. He is a product of a marketing campaign and his followers, like him, are naive.
To be fair there should be an equal numbers of dems and Libs as the deciding team, or you could simply get more independents like me. Fiscal conservatives, who favor gun control and the right to choose, and also smaller taxes and government. This would be hard for me to judge........so many conflicts with both posters.... DD
SF provides relevant evidence? I have only seen twisted informations and illogical conclusions from him. That guy is not dumb. He is a troll. He come here to amuse himself. I am surprised to see someone even bite. I do not like the way TJ put things either. But that guy at least mean what he says. If I have to vote for one of them, I will vote for TJ because I hate to see a troll prevail in a forum.
When there are actual issues Sam usually ponies up with real evidence. When the issues and arguments put forward are the kind of manufactured non-issues we see so much of, then SF treats them appropriately.
lol yeah, let's bring wives (note the plurality, mccain supporters) into the fray. How about extramarital affairs while we're at it?
seriously I want to be in on the panel. You guys can review my posts on the energy situation I am pretty moderate. Or if you think I am conservative or liberal whatever. BAsically I am good for the panel because I will actually read all of the posts.
If this ever happens, the best people for a panel will be the ones who didn't campaign for it. No offense.
If I see a pet in the living room as a dog, I will assume that same pet still a dog in the family room. A troll is a troll. You do not have to tell me he is only sometimes a troll, therefore he is not a troll.
Amendment: Upon reaching their post maximum, the contestants will be judged by a three person panel ultimately chosen by Jeff and Clutch, whose only job will be finding impartial people to judge the debate. Each contestant will submit a list of three posters and one judge will be chosen from each list. Jeff and Clutch will choose a third judge based on any criteria they choose. The three person panel will vote and the winner declared based on that vote.
I would like to formally call for a sig bet structured exactly like this one on the topic of drug policy. I would prefer t_j for personal reasons, but will be happy to have a debate with anyone who believes we need to continue using the War on Drugs strategy with regards to drugs. With the above amendment, of course.
Are you talking about his claim that the peaceful demonstrators against the biased media last month are Nazi? And then he backed up this claim by posting the 1930's German Nazi gathering picture which is the relevant evidence?
