1. Welcome! Please take a few seconds to create your free account to post threads, make some friends, remove a few ads while surfing and much more. ClutchFans has been bringing fans together to talk Houston Sports since 1996. Join us!

[Poll] Trading out of the 2026 draft, terrible mistake?

Discussion in 'Houston Rockets: Game Action & Roster Moves' started by Aruba77, May 8, 2026.

?

Mistake?

  1. Yes

    92 vote(s)
    79.3%
  2. No

    24 vote(s)
    20.7%
  1. Aruba77

    Aruba77 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 1999
    Messages:
    17,542
    Likes Received:
    23,524
    Blunder of epic proportions?
     
    Joe Rocket and Arnel like this.
  2. MadMax

    MadMax Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 1999
    Messages:
    78,342
    Likes Received:
    29,177
    massive lol
     
    Arnel likes this.
  3. don grahamleone

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2001
    Messages:
    23,959
    Likes Received:
    36,640
    Unknowable? Inknown commodity?
     
  4. J.R.

    J.R. Member

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Messages:
    118,129
    Likes Received:
    188,870
    “We are not a developmental team anymore.” — Stonedoka


    They’d draft another lottery bust.
     
  5. OremLK

    OremLK Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2010
    Messages:
    23,554
    Likes Received:
    23,727
    Yeah. I don't think there's any real chance Brooklyn would have gotten out of the high lotto this season either way, and people who say "they wouldn't have tanked" are deep in the cope. They didn't have a choice, they were screwed. Mikal Bridges as your #1 option is laughable now, in hindsight.

    This draft could have really given direction to the franchise at a critical moment.

    That said, the new lottery structure does breath a little bit of life into the trade. but some of that depends on the 2027 draft, which is... not good.
     
  6. Aruba77

    Aruba77 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 1999
    Messages:
    17,542
    Likes Received:
    23,524
    delete
     
    Jontro likes this.
  7. don grahamleone

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2001
    Messages:
    23,959
    Likes Received:
    36,640
    lol,,, you remembered! Only a few will.
     
  8. Aruba77

    Aruba77 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 1999
    Messages:
    17,542
    Likes Received:
    23,524
    I don’t think the odds would be much different. Stone got played by Brooklyn. And it certainly doesn’t exonerate undermining the value of our Sun’s picks by giving them Dillon, Jalen and the #10 pick.
     
    Arnel likes this.
  9. don grahamleone

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2001
    Messages:
    23,959
    Likes Received:
    36,640
    Lol... the 50 win lottery busts keep stacking up!
     
  10. Mathloom

    Mathloom Shameless Optimist
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    22,348
    Likes Received:
    24,449
    Nah. We won 52 last season then acquired KD. Rationally you expect to win more games this season and go further in the playoffs. There’s no reason to keep your own pick. There’s no reason the Suns/Nets let you keep this pick.

    Honestly I think this criticism is silly. You would not be giving a F about this pick if they had cashed in a future pick or Adams or Tari for a PG at the deadline because we would have made it to the second round. If FVV and KD were healthy we might have even made the conference finals.
     
  11. Aruba77

    Aruba77 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 1999
    Messages:
    17,542
    Likes Received:
    23,524
    I don’t give a sh#t about making the 2nd round for the sake of it. I want a franchise player that gives us a chance to go all the way. Something people conveniently seem to gloss over. What’s “silly” is passing up a bird in the hand lotto pick in a generational draft.
     
  12. Mathloom

    Mathloom Shameless Optimist
    Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    22,348
    Likes Received:
    24,449
    Fine that you don’t care but reality is that if we made progress to the second round with two rotation players missing (Adams and FVV) then it’s legitimate to say we’re close to a conference finals. That's a step forward for a team that is going to have internal development from many players. It's good momentum. Advancing one round each season is passable progress to most, even if not you and me.

    It’s also a matter of fact that if we made it that far then the very same young players you don’t believe in would mathematically have better stats and performances which would lift the assessment of whether they’re good building blocks.

    It’s also important that neither Phoenix nor Brooklyn nor Houston would have a high pick in this draft if we didn’t give Brooklyn the pick. They simply would have acquired better players instead of tanking and we would’ve had a 8th pick or lower. We’re not picking a better player than Sengun that late in the draft.
     
    #12 Mathloom, May 9, 2026
    Last edited: May 9, 2026
  13. Jontro

    Jontro Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2010
    Messages:
    37,061
    Likes Received:
    26,965
    rox made the right decision.

    fred van fleet coming back is like the equivalent of a topic 5 pick. we're taking over the league next year.
     
    MystikArkitect likes this.
  14. daywalker02

    daywalker02 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2006
    Messages:
    107,842
    Likes Received:
    55,397
    Stoned and deleted.

     
    Crashlanded19, Arnel and kjayp like this.
  15. cheke64

    cheke64 Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2009
    Messages:
    27,701
    Likes Received:
    20,058
    We would draft another skinny scrawny guy that the ringer recommended.
     
  16. Rockets12

    Rockets12 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2011
    Messages:
    4,939
    Likes Received:
    690
    Who cares. Stone would have wasted the pick anyways
     
  17. pmac

    pmac Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2007
    Messages:
    8,575
    Likes Received:
    3,560
    The Nets would not have tanked if they did not have their own picks. In that last season before we traded them their picks back they won 32 games. That's the 10th pick this year with zero improvement. Once Ben Simmons' contract rolled off the books they would have used their cap space to sign or trade for big inprovements and traded lower draft picks for good players. They would not be conveying a top 5 pick. It's really simple.

    People confuse saying the Nets would not have tanked with they would have been good. No, they still would have sucked, but in a year when nearly half the league was tanking they would have won too many games to convey a pick near the level you guys are dreaming about.
     
    #17 pmac, May 9, 2026
    Last edited: May 9, 2026
  18. WestendMassive

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2003
    Messages:
    23,976
    Likes Received:
    47,395
    maybe, maybe no?
     
    don grahamleone and daywalker02 like this.
  19. Reeko

    Reeko Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2017
    Messages:
    57,353
    Likes Received:
    157,385
    trading out of this draft was horrific

    but this is what happens when a dumb GM in way over his head thinks he’s outsmarting another team

    when Stone gave BK their pick back in a very strong draft, they laughed until tears rolled down their face and then hit up the most expensive restaurant in the city to celebrate
     
  20. Aruba77

    Aruba77 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 1999
    Messages:
    17,542
    Likes Received:
    23,524
    they won those 32 games with Mikal Bridges. Are u arguing that they would have kept Bridges and not made that trade with the Knicks? No way they are passing up that trade. No way.

    here are the eastern conference teams that finished below the Nets that season:

    Raptors
    Hornets
    Wizards
    Pistons

    Three of those teams are playoff or play-in teams now. The Bulls and Pacers were the only tanking teams ahead of them. Would they have won 20 games this season not intentionally trying to tank? Probably not. But 26 wins, the number they won without bridges in 2024-2025, is very realistic. That puts them at 7th this past season. I’ll take those odds in a generational draft.
     

Share This Page

  • About ClutchFans

    Since 1996, ClutchFans has been loud and proud covering the Houston Rockets, helping set an industry standard for team fan sites. The forums have been a home for Houston sports fans as well as basketball fanatics around the globe.

  • Support ClutchFans!

    If you find that ClutchFans is a valuable resource for you, please consider becoming a Supporting Member. Supporting Members can upload photos and attachments directly to their posts, customize their user title and more. Gold Supporters see zero ads!


    Upgrade Now