"Charlottesville" was a lie, funded by liberal SPLC, who also paid the KKK

@Os Trigonum
@Tomstro
@Salvy

These SPLC people probably funded those greedy white kids trying to take money from Michael

F them

 

this is the statue SPLC really wanted for Charlottesville

 

SPLC wanted some woke statues breh
Like Dylan Mulvaney
@Salvy

 

Democrats fund Hamas too
And those white dick lickers who try to steal money from Michael Jackson
@glynch
@Scarface281
@pgabriel
@Salvy

 

Allegedly (per the actual quote) funded $270k. What was this alleged $270k invested to in?

Charlottesville was one event that was years of a culmination of a battle over confederate statues.

Leaving that aside what are these other events planned by splc informants?

 

@Os Trigonum
@RB713
White liberals hate Michael Jackson

 

Only a partially and ill-informed person with an agenda for something beyond accuracy would be fooled by this.

 

@pgabriel faints.

 

See post #166

 

The Charlottesville rally was organized because the white nationalists were angry confederate statues were coming down in Virginia. The reason the state made that decision was a white nationalist killed nine people at a black church.


The event had hundreds of participants and sparked a national debate over Confederate iconography, racial violence, and white supremacy. The rally occurred amid the controversy which was generated by the removal of Confederate monuments by local governments following the Charleston church shooting in 2015, in which a white supremacist shot and killed nine at a black church.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unite_the_Right_rally

 

please don't quote wokepedia.

 

What's incorrect? Those are easily verifiable facts. That rally had nothing to do with the indictments and can you point to any white nationalist event funded by the splc?

 

@basso
@Salvy
@Os Trigonum
White liberals made that fake movie about Michael Jackson while knowing that he was found innocent
Why are you on their side ? They hate you and Mike

 

why would you use shell companies to disguise payments if you were just paying "informants"?

 

Why would you use "shell companies" to pay informants? idk man, maybe so the KKK doesn't find out who's snitching on them? LOL.

 

For the smartest people on earth

Turns out 'hiding who pays the informant so the KKK doesn't kill them' is... exactly what the FBI does too.

Anyway, when this gets dismissed, you guys can go lick your tail again.

Legal experts skeptical of DOJ's criminal case against Southern Poverty Law Center | Alabama Reflector

“The conduct at the core of the indictment, paying confidential sources inside violent extremist groups to gather intelligence, is something federal law enforcement does as a matter of course,” said Cassandra Burke Robertson, director of the Center for Professional Ethics at Case Western Reserve University law school. “Charging a civil rights organization criminally for doing the same thing, in this political context, strikes me as an abuse of the criminal law.”

“It is very thin, (and) does not adequately allege in my judgment any violation of the mail or wire fraud statutes (which are the indictment’s key allegations),” said John C. Coffee Jr., a professor at the Columbia University Law School, in a statement. “SPLC was under no duty to disclose to the world that it was paying secret agents to advise it about the activities of violent organizations. That it paid agents to inform it does not imply that it was supporting these organizations, even if the agents (with mixed motives) gave some of the payments to the organization.”

Robertson said that organizations, including the government, regularly use confidential informants because it is an important tool to collect information about groups that actively withhold information about their activities.

In the indictment, the DOJ alleged several instances of wire fraud. But Robertson said “it doesn’t seem to me there was any criminal intent at all.”


“When you are paying an informant who is deeply embedded in a group that is engaged in violent activity, whether it is terrorism or others, you don’t want to risk their lives by making it clear they were receiving payments,” she said.

Robertson said the indictment doesn’t even go as far as to allege any criminal intent to defraud financial institutions. The allegations were that SPLC tried to hide its activity from its donors.

“That seems really problematic to me,” Robertson said. “I don’t believe the donors were, in any way, misled.”

In the end, Robertson said the government will likely have a difficult time proving its case.

“I would be surprised if this case made it very far in the process,” she said. “I would be absolutely shocked if it went all the way to a conviction. I think it will get dismissed earlier in the process.”

 

You are the LIAR. Pumping out LIES wholesale in this forum. You have no shame.

 

All the people who hate Michael Jackson are white democrats