"Charlottesville" was a lie, funded by liberal SPLC, who also paid the KKK

The response by the demonic left here was entirely predictable.

 

You need mental help. Also don’t ever go to any of the countries in Scandinavia tons of demons there bro.

 

I expect the SPLC to come out not guilty and you will cope yet again.

 

Where is the false statement? These are allegations and they clearly say SPLC funded Unite the Right like the post your quoted says.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/fede...ty-law-center-wire-fraud-false-statements-and
Between 2014 and 2023, the SPLC secretly funneled more than $3 million in donated funds to individuals who were associated with various violent extremist groups including:

• Ku Klux Klan
• United Klans of America
• Unite the Right
• National Alliance
• National Socialist Movement
• Aryan Nations affiliated Sadistic Souls Motorcycle Club
• National Socialist Party of America (American Nazi Party)
• American Front

You just denied them.

 

You're a Godless, demonic, leftist. You have no relationship to truth.

 

Do you go around like this in actual life? Or do you just chill behind your screens while you sound deranged?

 

Why do you support the Washington Establishment stealing trillions from the American people?

 

Do you go about your day sounding like a lunatic or not? Answer the question. Do you go to a job and the grocery store calling people demons or not?

 

You support total corruption by demonic people. I know that you don't believe in dark, spiritual, forces but they exist and they whisper into your ear and you do their bidding as you are doing now. One day you will die and you will have to answer for choosing evil.

 

Wrong. I don’t deny that a person associated with that organization (and other similar racist orgs) were funded as informants. That is the basic fact. That is very different than the baseless claim that Unite the Right is a “front group” created by the SPLC or similarly aligned left-wing groups. Such a claim or implication is false.

 

I guess you are incapable of answering a clear question that is asked 3 times.

 

Your "question" is rhetorical. You are blind and lost. You need to humble yourself and seek Jesus, who is your Lord and Savior.

 

You are completely unhinged. I saw you post 10 times in a row on the 2nd page of this thread. This type of deranged behavior is what leads to violence.

 

The SPLC has turned into a grift, if it wasn't one from the beginning.

https://www.newyorker.com/news/news...rris-dees-and-the-southern-poverty-law-center

 

You mean Donald J Trump stealing from the American people. HE IS THE WASHINGTON ESTABLISHMENT.L

 

Thanks for the link. AI summary:

Here is a concise, content-focused summary of the Southern Poverty Law Center piece:


Core thesis

The article is a first-person critical account by a former employee arguing that the organization, despite real civil-rights accomplishments, developed deep internal dysfunction and a fundraising-driven culture that conflicted with its public image.


Key points

1. Public reputation vs internal reality

• Externally, the SPLC was seen as a heroic civil-rights group fighting hate (especially the KKK).
• Internally, staff often felt the organization was overly focused on fundraising and image, sometimes at odds with its mission.

2. Fundraising machine built around fear and symbolism

• Morris Dees was portrayed as a highly effective direct-mail fundraiser.
• The SPLC’s campaigns emphasized threats from hate groups, which critics inside the organization felt were sometimes exaggerated or strategically framed to drive donations.

3. Strategic targeting of the Ku Klux Klan

• The SPLC’s legal victories against the Klan were real but, by the 1980s, the Klan was already relatively weak.
• The article suggests Dees chose it partly because it was a symbolically powerful but legally vulnerable target, making it effective both in court and for fundraising.

4. Organizational culture problems

• Allegations of racial inequities: Black staff were disproportionately in lower-level roles.
• Claims of top-down leadership and lack of accountability, centered on Dees and leadership.
• Reports of sexual harassment concerns and broader workplace issues.

5. Internal cynicism among staff

• Employees increasingly felt they were participating in something ethically ambiguous—described as a “highly profitable” enterprise with a moral mission attached.

6. Dees’s firing as a catalyst, not a resolution

• Dees was dismissed abruptly in 2019 (without detailed public explanation).
• Staff viewed this not as an isolated issue but as evidence of long-standing systemic problems.

7. Moral tension at the center of the piece

• The author acknowledges the SPLC did meaningful work.
• But argues that good outcomes coexisted with internal practices that undermined its stated values, including how donor money was raised and used.

Bottom line

The article is not a takedown of the SPLC’s entire mission; it’s a critical insider account claiming that over time the organization became institutionally misaligned—combining genuine advocacy with a fundraising-driven, hierarchical, and ethically uneasy internal culture.
​

Given the internal culture, it wouldn’t surprise me that the money they collected from donors was being used to fund informants embedded at different levels in these racist/hate groups, and as the indictment itself indicated they wouldn’t want to publicly disclose that for obvious reasons.