Leftists, do you agree that taxpayers must pay sex-change operations for illegals?

Bro you think they want transgender only illegals?
They’ll look at your dog and want to chop his sack off

woke is more than evil breh
@Commodore
@raining threes
@Salvy
@glynch

 

Democrats is just a code word for people who want to transgender your kids
@Commodore
@glynch
@Salvy

 

@astros123 loves the transgenders...

 

He thinks it sounds just like Whitney
@glynch

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Gateway_Pundit

The Gateway Pundit (TGP) is an American far-right[2] fake news website.[1] The website is known for publishing falsehoods, hoaxes, and conspiracy theories.[35]

 

First, the source is very dubious.

Second, I have zero issue with a Catholic Charity like St. Vincent not asking for immigration status. They are a charity, they are modeled after the teaching of Jesus Christ and serving others.

As for paying for sex operations? No, I don't really support tax funds being spent for sex operations on illegal immigrants.

What I do support is the Dreams Bill, more open (but at times selective) immigration and increased monitoring at the Southern border and Northern border to keep illegal immigration honest.

I support there being some form of health services for everyone in the USA - and I support a progressive (reasonable) tax on billionaires, ending many corporate subsidies, drop automotive tariffs, and decreasing the percentage of the budget by 1% a year for 15 years for the military.

 

Per Chatgtp

"Wikipedia is generally considered an unreliable source for formal academic research because it is user-generated, editable by anyone, and prone to vandalism or inaccuracies. While useful for quick, general, or scientific info, its open nature, potential for bias, and reliance on secondary sources make it unsuitable for citation in authoritative work."

 

Uhhh.... How could I not?

Is The Gateway Pundit a reliable news source

Chatgtp:

Is chat GPT consider a reliable source for academic research?

Chatgtp:

Is chat GPT generally considered a reliable source on deciding if Wikipeadia is a reliable source for formal academic research?

Chatgtp:

 

I don't know, probably for the same reason right wingers don't complain about the bias and often untruthful reporting by their sources?

I can say that some "progressives", are notorious for sh*tting on the democratic establishment and legacy media, and particularly progressive left independent journalist / political commentators sh*t on establishment left media fairly frequently, from my observations.

 

Here’s a legit source

 

Why do you tag me on these dumb posts when you know I agree with you on the LGBTQ stuff.

 

You can't be pro LGBTQIA+ politicians and against LGBTQIA+.... You gotta pick and chose, you either support this nonsense or not...

 

You really can’t fathom having independent thinking on a per issue basis and not falling in party line on every single issue ?

 

Why in the hell do I have to make LGBTQ stuff my #1 issue? I don't give a **** what someone's view is on the topic cuz I know how I'll raise my kids. I don't need a politicians help in raising my kids.

Whats important to me is corruption, breaking up big corporations who steal from us, Healthcare and other economic issues. You've made culture war stuff your number 1 issue which is just dumb as hell.

The billionaires and the elites are laughing their ass off at people like you who focus on culture war garbage instead on real issues which is wealth inequality.

 

Actually its the opposite, Democrats fall in line on what ever their fav woke politician is upset about.