Tech leaders urge pause in 'out-of-control' AI race

Anthropic chief says AI could surpass “almost all humans at almost everything” shortly after 2027

https://arstechnica.com/ai/2025/01/...mans-at-almost-everything-shortly-after-2027/

This is from a WSJ interview posted on youtube, but they didn't have a good article on it, so found this.



{DOOMED}

 

so you're saying the Dems are gonna run an AI candidate in 2028?

 

If posting articles means that WE are saying something then.... lord have mercy on your soul.

 

coincidentally, this is the first reported case of AI-generated hacking

A hacker---using Anthropic's Chatbot---automated
an ‘unprecedented’ cybercrime spree

​

 

and they want zero AI regulation for the next 10 years in their Big Bullsh*t Bill

I agree that this should be 100% illegal and come with jail time

this is just another way to spread lies and propaganda and further erode this country

 

OOPS

 

Rocket River

 

lol related
@Os Trigonum
@Salvy
@Scarface281
@RB713
@Space Ghost
@CrixusTheUndefeatedGaul
@Commodore

 

Yea people are humans, we are dynamic and can certainly be more problematic than robots at times.

I just can't stop thinking of the seemingly glaring question, what happens to us people? A small number of the owners of production implement high level AI/robotics/tech advancement to achieve such great efficiency that you can mass replace humans in the work force.

Okay, where do people earn money? Who is able to buy things from Amazon if nobody has a job?

Great efficiency is a legitimately beautiful and wonderful thing, as long as "externalities" are accounted for, because if the outcome isn't an improvement for human life, what are we doing?

 

@Salvy
@CrixusTheUndefeatedGaul
@Space Ghost
@Os Trigonum
@RB713
For this particular case
Amazon doesn’t need a state of the art t-1000 replacement model
Maybe just a roomba

 

Communism. The free market capitalists don't know the trouble they are causing themselves.

 

@Os Trigonum
@Jontro
@Salvy
@RB713

 

Or they do know what they're causing, its calculated, and they don't believe they are at sufficient risk of succumbing to people lead political uprisings or societal chaos due to their relative positions and abilities.

Maybe I'm just a dejected pessimist, but I have a pretty hard time seeing the ordinary folk winning a modern french revolution.

 

Maybe individuals are insulated. But I don’t see how billions of people with no viable way to eat and seek fulfilling lives fails to grab control by the scruff of the neck. I’m not saying it will be a good thing at all either. It would perpetuate suffering. But what can’t be the end-state is a world in which billions of people have no way to share in the wealth humanity generates.

 

Is this reeko’s wife?

 

I could imagine quite a few ways they could fail.

My gut feeling is the greatest threat to the elite will be infighting with other elites. Maybe that could create a path for the people, or maybe it’ll be the end of the world lol.

Like I said, probably more dejected and pessimistic than most. Extreme ways to dictate the world are becoming increasingly more accessible with tech advancement and concentration of wealth-power.

 

Louis XVI probably thought the same of ordinary people.